Posted by: Anonymous
Date: June 17, 2006 08:51AM
Where is the sugar and the primary explosive?
That stuff would not blow anything up!
Is this the excuse needed to ....
Posted by: Anonymous
Date: June 17, 2006 12:48PM
Go back to your crack pipe 2670.Any fukn fool
knows what the other ingredient is.
Posted by: sunny_
Date: June 17, 2006 03:10PM
Looks like the terror stuff some secret and other police came up with in
Toronto Canada.Ever since Canada went metric over 20 years ago ,they are still a
little bit confused.3000 lbs. does not equal 25kg. Lets see it if it's realy
there.
Posted by: Anonymous
Date: June 18, 2006 12:39PM
OK, so I'm old and confused.Where does it mention 3000lbs., Sunny?
Posted by: sunny_
Date: June 19, 2006 06:54PM
These items are suppose to have been taken from some moslems who were supposely
going to cut the Prime Minister of canada's head off and blow up a pile of
shit.The feds in canada said it could of been bigger than the Oklahoma city
bombing in 1995 because the moslems had 3000 lbs of fertilizer. No 3000 lbs of
the fertilizer has been shown on T.V. and newspapers yet. If the police do a
big drug bust, the photos of dope make it look like they're swimming in the
stuff. So why are they lacking in the photo display in this case? Did someone
purchase 1 bag for a photo? Is the explosives evidence available other than on
audio tape or written on paper or hearsay? Time may tell us more or time may
help us forget what looks like a poor setup.
|
