GAK67 Report This Comment Date: October 28, 2008 02:29AM
Based on that, McCain wont win!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 28/10/2008 02:57AM by GAK67.
Mint Report This Comment Date: October 28, 2008 07:58AM
haha durr. I'm used to someone always going middle on their first move
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 28/10/2008 04:07PM by Mint.
GAK67 Report This Comment Date: October 28, 2008 08:25AM
Obama 1st move top left
McCain 1st move bottom left
Obama 2nd bottom right
McCain 2nd middle middle (blocking Obama's diagonal top left to bottom right
win)
Obabma 3rd top right (blocking McCain's diagonal bottom left to top right
win)
Might not be great strategy, but seems fairly logical to me Mint!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 28/10/2008 08:27AM by GAK67.
shaDEz Report This Comment Date: October 28, 2008 09:16AM
In Relation to the "Lesser Evil" Election Trap, and the Argument:
"Someone is Going to be President."
Imagine a slave plantation, where the slave-owner is clever enough to allow the
slaves to vote, every few years, on who will be the Overseer, who will
administer, regulate and enforce the exploitation, brutality and humiliation to
which the slaves are subjected. Imagine somebody arguing that it is important to
get caught up in such elections--because, after all, "
Someone
is going to be Overseer"--rather than focusing people's attention and
efforts on rising up to break free from the slave plantation and finally put an
end to the whole system of slavery!
Or imagine a prison full of thousands and thousands of people wrongly
incarcerated, where once again the prison administration is clever enough to
allow the wrongly imprisoned inmates to vote, every few years, on who will be
the Warden. Imagine someone arguing that it is important to get involved in
these elections--because, after all, "
Someone is going to be
Warden"--rather than focusing people's attention and efforts on ending this
wrongful imprisonment and sweeping away the whole system that continually
perpetuates all this injustice!
Once Again:
FOOD FOR THOUGHT.
(
from...)
z
Azzz
you need really strong eyes to read this size
text... like pro_junior has
jgoins Report This Comment Date: October 28, 2008 11:45AM
You cannot get a vast majority of people to agree on any one thing at any given
time so how can a revolution ever succeed?
shaDEz Report This Comment Date: October 28, 2008 12:06PM
interesting... apparently a "vast majority of people"
do
"agree" that this is as good as it gets... that the said group believe
this and yet they can't agree on anything and instead of doing anything about
being enslaved to what we all produce (quite sad really) just accept it
as if things are unchanging, yet we are constantly advancing the forces of said
production... not to deny that things have gone beyond what they were, that
progress was made, but at the same time deny this by saying "we can't get
beyond this"
yawn... you're sarcastic because you fail to see this irony presented before
you... and when you do you deny that it is there, for it goes against everything
that you've been taught (also quite sad) and hide behind something that doesn't
take any material form... bleh
z
Azzz
you need really strong eyes to read this size
text... like pro_junior has
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: October 28, 2008 04:38PM
i'd like to see a couple thousand people revolt. we hadn't had a good police
bashing of stupid protesters in years now.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 28/10/2008 04:39PM by fossil_digger.
jgoins Report This Comment Date: October 29, 2008 11:53AM
Even if tens of thousands revolted, it would be defeated. What would be
required for success would be for the military and police to join a revolt. The
gun grabbers have weakend the private citizen too much for there guns to make
much difference. If Obama wins the election I might join in the call for a
revolt.