If the religious "masters" indeed simply added Theorists to their claims, I'd have a lot more respect for their position. It's when they ceremoniously claim it as Truth, The Way or the Path To Enlightenment that gets me goin.

It would seem to me that placing belief in some everlasting salvation for eternity through embracement of an improvable religious construct is nearer madness or lunacy than simply asking why such embracement would seem logical without some form of verifiable proof. However, these are titles commonly conferred upon non-believers by theists for asking such simple logic based questions