tjbustem Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2007 12:31PM
Why would somebody rate this a 1? Is it that poor of a picture or is it they
just don't like the poster?
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2007 12:35PM
just a peckerhead anon that gives everything a 1.
he must think a
1 is bad for the poster, when in actuality all those 1's could be the reason i'm
the #1 poster. keep 'em coming dipshit!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2007 02:28PM
Yeah....14 y/o's are beautiful things.
tjbustem Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2007 02:50PM
Unless you know this girl how do you know her age? Besides, you haven't been
to the pool or beach lately have you? Most of those 14 year olds have less
cotton on than you can find in an aspirin bottle. Don't blame the girls, blame
the parents.
ORLANDO399 Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2007 04:12PM
Met Art posting chics under age,yeah right and im the pope.Looks to me like
she's in her early twenties.
Mint Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2007 05:02PM
1 nothing special
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2007 06:17PM
I rate it a 1 also because it looks airbrushed (I know, photoshopped) to me. A
lot of metart looks like artificial smoothing has been applied, don't get me
wrong they do it better than a lot of other sites, that is to say with miore
sublety.
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2007 07:29PM
I don't ever really care how anyone rates any of my pics, I mean really, like
I'm gonna win a trip to Paris or somethin
I do however take exception with 2 notions posted above.
1. Another very suspicious mention by an oddly "anonymous" poster
about this chic bein 14 .... sounds like someone we all know is prone to such
comments who otherwise posts under a username ... hmmmm, why doncha grind that
ax some more dillweed
2. If Met Art were prone to airbrushing dudn it seem as if the moles and
freckles would be the 1st things they'd take out? And why in the hell would
they even bother to airbrush a non nude pic at all?
In my experiences Met Art is one of the premier sites who actually seek to do
all natural photography of ones just like this chic, who are simply beautiful
without trying to "play" with their images at all. With likely a few
thousand Met Art pics in my collection I've yet to have come across even one
that seems as if it's been manipulated.
Then again, all things are possible, so as always, YMMV
tjbustem Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2007 07:47PM
I still don't see how it rates a 1. someone took the time and effort to do it
and it should rate more than some lame ass unairbrushed/photoshoped pic.
ORLANDO399 Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2007 08:12PM
Seem's like all the chic pics are getting ones..hmmm
SkullandChains Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2007 08:42PM
Wasn't me who rated it with a 1. Not going to rate it either.